National 2A News

The Supreme Court reversed the Second Circuit’s anti-Second Amendment decision and remanded Antonyuk v. James for re-hearing, impacting New York’s Concealed Carry Improvement Act. The ruling challenges provisions on “good moral character,” interviews, references, and training, reinforcing Second Amendment protections in light of the Rahimi decision.

The Supreme Court’s 8-1 decision upholding a gun ban for those with domestic violence restraining orders leaves unresolved questions about red flag laws and the limits of Constitutional protections. The ruling’s complex implications are highlighted by contrasting views between the majority and Justice Thomas’s lone dissent.

In a landmark 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court overturned the federal bump stock ban, challenging the classification of bump stocks as machine guns. This ruling impacts Second Amendment rights, with a surprising admission from the dissenting justices that could shape future debates on assault weapons.

A federal judge’s ruling against the ATF’s pistol brace ban could change gun regulation forever. Explore the case details and its impact on the firearms community.

Find out how a recent court ruling protects certain gun owners from new ATF regulations regarding firearm sales. This article delves into the legal battle and a shocking Arkansas raid, emphasizing the importance of supporting gun rights groups.

The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals will hear a critical case, SAF v. ATF, challenging the ATF’s controversial pistol brace rule. With potentially 40 million braced AR pistols affected, the outcome could impact gun rights nationwide and may even escalate to the Supreme Court.

On May 30, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of the NRA in NRA v. Vullo, stating that government officials cannot coerce private entities to suppress disfavored views, thus upholding First Amendment protections. The NRA claimed Maria Vullo pressured insurers to sever ties after the 2018 Parkland shooting.

Biden’s weaponized ATF just took a loss in federal court. A temporary restraining order was issued preventing them from enforcing the new and ambiguous “Engaged in the Business” rule. It may be only one battle in a larger war but one of the criteria for issuing a restraining order is “a likelihood of success on the merits.” This is likely a sign of bigger and better things to come.

We’ve said it before and we’ll say it again: California has no limits when it comes to violating civil rights when it comes to so-called “public safety.” Law-abiding, peaceable citizens will now be footing the bill, to the tune of an additional 11%, in the form of a facially-unconstitutional tax, to purchase ammunition.

A court not well-known for ruling properly in 2nd Amendment cases, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals just properly applied Bruen. The case involved a non-violent convicted felon’s challenge to firearm possession prohibition.

New York is where gun rights go to die. Most rights, in fact. A New York Senator has no problem disregarding multiple US Supreme Court decisions and is now trying to ban semi-auto pistols, such as Glock.